- nnenna hacks
- Posts
- The Double-Edged Sword: The Reward is in the Risks of AI
The Double-Edged Sword: The Reward is in the Risks of AI
How technologists can harness AI’s full potential, safely and responsibly.

We’re living in a defining moment for AI. In 2025, AI is truly transforming how we work, communicate, and build. From autonomous agents to generative copilots, we’re seeing breakthroughs once thought impossible.
But as with every technological leap, new capabilities bring new responsibilities. To me, risk isn’t the enemy. We’re building something powerful enough to matter.
We can build trust into AI systems that scale. To protect the promise of this technology by designing it with care.
Why AI risks are milestones
Every major innovation (electricity, aviation, the internet, etc.) faced a wave of early risks. AI is no different. The presence of risk signals that we’ve crossed into world-changing territory.
The challenge in 2025 is actually understanding risks deeply enough to govern wisely without slowing down innovation.
Two modern frameworks are helping us do just that:
MIT’s AI Risk Repository (2025) gives us a structured view of over 1,600 AI risks across human, system, and deployment levels. It reflects the real-world complexity of scaling AI.
NIST’s AML Taxonomy (2025) focuses on adversarial threats, equipping builders with the language and defenses needed to secure AI systems against misuse or failure.
The true purpose of these tools is to build smarter, safer, and faster.
The AI rewards (and responsibilities) are real
The systems we’re building today can:
Accelerate drug discovery
Automate routine work and unlock human creativity
Scale personalized education and healthcare
Drive accessibility and communication across languages and abilities
Help organizations operate more intelligently, sustainably, and securely
But realizing these benefits means tackling challenges head-on, especially as generative models and agents become more capable and autonomous.
What AI risk really looks like in 2025
Here’s what we’re seeing across real-world LLM and agent deployments today:
Risk Area | Why It Matters |
---|---|
Prompt Injection | Attacks that trick models into revealing sensitive data or bypassing safeguards |
Hallucinations | Confident, incorrect outputs can mislead decisions if left unchecked |
Bias | Bias in training data can scale unfairness if not actively mitigated |
Data Poisoning | Corrupt training inputs that degrade model performance or introduce backdoors |
Explainability | Lack of visibility into model behavior complicates debugging and trust |
Over-Reliance | Users delegating too much to AI systems without verification |
Multi-Agent Coordination | As agents collaborate, emergent behaviors can lead to cascading failures if not designed carefully |
Reframe these risks for a moment. Consider them to be engineering challenges. With the right patterns, governance, and collaboration, they’re solvable.
AI agents are unlocking the next wave of productivity
Autonomous agents are shifting how we think about AI. They can:
Automate multi-step workflows
Plan and execute goals
Interact with APIs, data, and other systems
Collaborate with users and/or with each other
This new paradigm opens doors for exponential gains in productivity, decision-making, and discovery.
But it also introduces new system-level risks:
Agents may act without full human supervision
Goal misalignment can lead to unintended outcomes
Multi-agent interactions can create complexity fast
Greater tool access = larger attack surfaces
Again, these are solvable design problems. The solution lies in clear alignment strategies, oversight mechanisms, and shared best practices. In times of potentially high stakes, panic isn’t the answer. Pragmatism is.
A smarter way to approach future AI risks
Some risks once considered futuristic are already here:
AI systems that operate with minimal human input
Sophisticated agents capable of goal-directed planning
Increased user trust in systems that are still evolving
Think of these shifts as reasons to level up how we build, monitor, and explain AI. I see it as opportunity, as opposed to reasons to abandon the innovation ship.
Your role in building the future of AI
Here’s how you can contribute, no matter your role:
Role | What to Focus On |
---|---|
Engineers & Researchers | - Design for alignment and safety - Build in interpretability, observability, and red-teaming |
Designers & UX Leaders | - Help users understand model limits - Create interfaces that encourage verification, not blind trust |
Product Managers | - Select high-impact, responsible use cases - Plan for graceful failure modes |
Executives & Founders | - Invest in AI safety research - Set a cultural tone of curiosity and caution |
Policymakers & Legal Teams | - Create agile frameworks - Align incentives between innovation and accountability |
End Users & Citizens | - Stay curious and engaged - Report issues and demand transparency |
The risks feel complex, but so is the reward: a future where AI enhances human agency.
Your turn
Will we allow risks to materialize through inaction, or will we proactively address them through thoughtful design, implementation, and governance?
AI risk is part of the path to impact. And we’re facing breakthroughs. I’d like to see all hands on deck from different professions and areas of expertise to harness the power of this technology for good.
Yes, we need guardrails. But I truly believe the premise of guardrails are about keeping us on track. To make sure the systems we’re building are worthy of the people who will rely on them.
We’re building the infrastructure of the future. Let’s build it well.
✅ Let’s Shape the Future of AI Together
The future of AI won’t be decided by chance—it’ll be shaped by the builders, leaders, and teams who act intentionally today.
If this post sparked something for you, whether it’s a challenge you’re navigating or a system you’re building, let’s talk. I’m opening up limited AI consulting sessions for teams and founders who are building AI-forward products and want guidance on risk, readiness, or governance.
🔗 Book a 1:1 strategy session with me here → Calendly
Let’s build trustworthy, high-impact AI, on purpose.
🔗 Sources & References
MIT AI Risk Repository (April 2025)
The AI Risk Repository: A Comprehensive Meta-Review, Database, and Taxonomy of Risks from Artificial Intelligence (Preprint v2)
https://airisk.mit.edu/blog/new-version-of-the-ai-risk-repository-preprint-now-available
https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.12622v2NIST AI 100-2 E2025 Report on Adversarial Machine Learning
Adversarial Machine Learning: A Taxonomy and Terminology of Attacks and Mitigations
https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/ai/100/2/e2025/finalDeloitte Insights (Feb 2025)
Managing Gen AI Risks: Four Emerging Categories to Watch
https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/topics/digital-transformation/four-emerging-categories-of-gen-ai-risks.htmlStanford HAI Predictions for AI in 2025
https://hai.stanford.edu/news/predictions-for-ai-in-2025-collaborative-agents-ai-skepticism-and-new-risksIBM Think Leadership (March 2025)
AI Agents in 2025: Expectations vs. Reality
https://www.ibm.com/think/insights/ai-agents-2025-expectations-vs-realityForbes Technology Council (March 2025)
How AI Agents Are Transforming Business in 2025 and Beyond
https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbestechcouncil/2025/03/27/how-ai-agents-are-transforming-business-in-2025-and-beyond/McKinsey & Company (January 2025)
Superagency in the Workplace: Empowering People to Unlock AI’s Full Potential
https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/superagency-in-the-workplace-empowering-people-to-unlock-ais-full-potential-at-workWorld Economic Forum (Dec 2024)
What Are the Risks and Benefits of 'AI Agents'?
https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/12/ai-agents-risks-artificial-intelligence/Berkeley SCET (Dec 2024)
The Next “Next Big Thing”: Agentic AI’s Opportunities and Risks
https://scet.berkeley.edu/the-next-next-big-thing-agentic-ais-opportunities-and-risks/
Reply